Abstract: Nowadays amount of solid wastes are increasing very fast. Accumulation of urban solid wastes is not balanced in perspective of good environmental management. Therefore, the study of urban solid wastes management system and the participation of urban communities in solid wastes management is needed. This study aimed to analyze level of importance and performance of the existing solid wastes management system, urban communities' participation, and relationship between urban community perception and their participation in existing system of solid waste management in Tomohon City. Scientific methodes in data analysis are the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA), The Chougill's ladder for participation level, and the Product-Moment correlation.Results of research suggested that existing waste management aspects that are on the first quadrant (as the main priority), consist of (a) lack of cleanliness of the solid wastes collection sites, (b) the limited numbers of the solid wastes collection sites, (c) time schedule for solid wates collection which is done on 2-3 days interval, (d) the fewer numbers of solid waste supervisor, and (e) the response to public complaints should be intensified in improving any public services in relation to solid wastes management. Results of community participation analysis based on Chougill 's ladder shows that community role in solid wastes management is in the phase of conspiracy (1.68), the community action is in the phase of peace (3.12), community motivation is in the phase of information (2.0), and community responsibility is in the phase of information (1.86). The relation between community perception (X) and community participation (Y) is statistically significant (r = 0.983). It is concluded that "community participation" in solid wastes management is significantly determined by their "perception".
Keywords: Importance Performance Analysis, Perception, Participation, Solid Wastes Management.
[1] Aryenti. 2011. Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Dengan Cara 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) di Lingkungan Permukiman Ditinjau Dari Segi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat. Jurnal Permukiman, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 75-83. www.jurnal.usu.ac.id/ index.php/persos/article.
[2] Chougill, M.B.G. 1996. A letter of Community Participation for Underdevelopment Countries,Habitat Intl, Vol.20; No.3; pp.431-444.
[3] Drackner M. 2005. An anthropological perspective on garbage. Waste Management and Research 23 :175-181.
[4] Ehrampoush, M.H., M.B. Mogahadam. 2005. Survey of knowledge, attitude and practice of Yazd University of Medical Sciences students about solid wastes disposal and recycling. Iranian J. Env. Health Sci Eng.,2(2):26-30.
[5] Hartanto W., H. Wahyono, W.P. Tyas, 2009. Kinerja Pengelolaan Sampah di Kota Gombong Kabupaten Kebumen.Jurnal Tata Kota dan Daerah, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 24-29.http://eprints.undip.ac.id/15948.
[6] Himawanto D.A., D. Dhewanggap, Indarto, H. Saptoadi, dan T.A. Rohmat, 2010. Pengolahan Sampah Kota Terseleksi Menjadi Refused Derived Fuel Sebagai Bahan Bakar Padat Alternatif. Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 127-133.
[7] Isa, M.H., F.A.H. Asaari, N.A. Ramli, S. Ahmad, T.S. Siew, 2005. Solid waste collection and recycling in Nibong, Tebal, Penang, Malaysia: a case study. Waste Managt & Res., 23(6): 565-570.
[8] Katonika K., 2009. What is an Integrated Waste Management Plan (IWMP)?. Tribal Waste Journal, Issue7,EPA53O-N-09-002.www.epa.gov/tribalmsw.
[9] Kitcharoen, K. 2004. The Importance-Performance Analysis Of Service Quality In Administrative Departments Of Private Universities In Thailand. ABAC Journal Vol. 24.No. 3. pp. 20-46. http://www.journal.au.edu/abac_journal/2004/sep04/ajvol24n3_article3.pdf
[10] Leuhery L., 2011. Kajian Keandalan Pola Penanggulangan Sampah Padat : Studi Kasus pada Kota Balikpapan-Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Arika, Vol. 05, No. 1, pp. 17-26.