Abstract: Electric Power systems are composed of a very large number of subsystems and components which are subject to failures. The consequences of a failure of a component or subsystem may range from no effect at all on the operation of the system to wide-scale power interruptions caused by system instability. The cost associated with component failure may depend on the severity of the failure and on the corrective action undertaken to remedy the situation. In most of the cases, there will be some cost associated with the use of manpower and equipment. To solve this problem, a mathematical optimization technique was adopted to determine the optimum preventive maintenance periods and the number of men required to perform the Preventive maintenance such that the total maintenance cost is minimized. Results from the search technique, demonstrated a minimized maintenance cost rate.
Key Words: Preventive Maintenance, Inspection, Replacement, Availability, Breakdown
[1] Jardine, A. K. S., Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability, Pitman Publishing (reprinted editions available from Canadian Scholar Press, Inc. 211 Grenadier Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) 1973
[2] Sim, S. H., and Endrenyi, J, Optimal Preventive Maintenance with Repair, IEEE Trans., 1988 Vol. R-37, No. 1., Pp. 92-96.
[3] Anders, G. J., Human Failure Considerations in determining Optimal Inspection Interval for the Equipment Used in Emergency Conditions, IEEE Trans., 1985 Vol. SMC-15, No. 2, pp. 290-294.
[4] Apostolakis, G. E. and Bansal, P. P. Effect of Human Error on the Availability of Periodically Inspected Redundant Systems, IEEE Trans., 1977 , Vol. R-26, No. 3, pp. 220-225.
[5] Barlow, R. E., and Hunter, L. Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies, Oper. Res., 1960, Vol. 8, pp. 90-100
[6] Gaertner, J. P. , Morgan, T. A., and Rodin, M. E. Insights Gained Through the Implementation of Reliability Centred Maintenance Practices at Nuclear Power Plants, in Proceedings of the 15th Inter-Ram Conference, Portland, Oregon, 1988, pp. 70-74
[7] Anders, G. J., Inspection Frequency and Availability of Emergency Equipment, Microelectron. Reliab., 1984 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 683 – 690.
[8] Keeney, R. L., Beley, J. R., Fleischauer, P., Kirkwood, C. W., and Sicherman, A. (1981), Decision Framework for Technology Choice. Vol. 1: A Case Study of One Utility's Coal-Nuclear Choice, Electric Research Power Institute Report No. EA-2153.
[9] Leitl, R., and Machek, J. On Optimum Preventive Maintenance Philosophy, Shoda Works, Nuclear Power Construction Division, Information Center, Report No. ZJE-274, 1986 Pilzen, Czechoslovakia.
[10] McWilliams, T. P. and Martz, H. F. Human Error Considerations in Determining the Optimum Test Interval for Periodically Inspected Standby Systems, IEEE Trans., 1980 Vol. R-29, No. 4 pp. 305-310